Michael Schwendt <bugs.michael@xxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, 28 Dec 2006 12:44:13 +0300, Peter Astakhov wrote: [...] > > For example, now in Fedora Extras exist package > > wesnoth-1.0.2-4.fc6.x86_64.rpm and wesnoth-1.2-1.fc6.x86_64.rpm > This is intentional. For stable releases of Fedora Extras we keep the > latest _two_ package releases. For FE Development we only keep the > latest. Nice to know that. Wrong way around, if you ask me. Breakage in rawhide is much more common, and thus the need to hunt down a not-yet-uptodate mirror (or futz around in /var/cache/yum/*/packages) for a working package. Or could "yum clean" be thaught to keep a few old versions behind? -- Dr. Horst H. von Brand User #22616 counter.li.org Departamento de Informatica Fono: +56 32 2654431 Universidad Tecnica Federico Santa Maria +56 32 2654239 Casilla 110-V, Valparaiso, Chile Fax: +56 32 2797513 -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list