On Thu, 2006-12-28 at 13:32 +0100, Axel Thimm wrote: > On Thu, Dec 28, 2006 at 01:04:46PM +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > > Toshio Kuratomi wrote: > > > > > * clement issue: Package has not been updated yet. We'll step in and > > >fix it after the meeting. > > > * rdieter to take a "No yum repo files in packages" rule to the > > >Packaging Committee. > > > > No repository files of any package manager including Yum. Apt and Smart > > would be a better rule. > > BTW there are exactly two other packages other than fedora-release > which legitimately carry repo information: fedora-package-config-{smart,apt}. > > Of course the repos in there are exactly the same as in the yum repos, > just translated in their syntax (as much as applies to these > depsolvers at least). > > Perhaps one day all repo config will make it in one fedora-repo-config > package. Perhaps the rule should simply be something along the lines of "No non-Fedora Project repos may be packaged", as that's the real issue. -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list