On Wednesday 27 December 2006 20:08, Anthony Green wrote: > Fernando (from PlanetCCRMA) and I have been talking about renaming > LADSPA plugin packages to prefix them with ladspa-, so today's > swh-plugins package in Extras would become ladspa-swh-plugins. > > I'd like to do this within FC6, but I have a few questions. Some answers here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/ProvidesObsoletes http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/PackageEndOfLife > In the ladspa-swh-plugins spec file, I assume I just... > > Obsoletes: swh-plugins < 0.4.15-5 > Provides: swh-plugins > > Right? The Provides: needs a version, like "swh-plugins = %{version}-%{release}". For more info, including guidelines for how long to keep the Provides in the future, see the ProvidesObsoletes draft above. > I also assume it's OK to just check this in and not go through another > review. Correct? Yes, if you're sure you got everything right. Remember also to add ladspa-swh-plugins to owners.list in CVS and to mark branches of swh-plugins that were renamed as dead in CVS (FC6+ I gather), see the PackageEndOfLife document above. > Is there anything I could push out in a swh-plugins update to force the > upgrade to ladspa-swh-plugins? The Obsoletes you're about to add should take care of that. > Or is there some way I can just from > swh-plugins from FC6 once ladspa-swh-plugins is out? ...can just what? ;) -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
