On Tue, 26 Dec 2006 17:38:43 +0100 fedora@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Ralf Ertzinger) wrote: > Hi. > > On Fri, 22 Dec 2006 06:54:52 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote > > > I can't find this situation to be satisfactory and actually think > > this situation is messed up. But, AFAICT, nobody but autogen > > actually uses libopts, so this isn't much of a problem. > > I just found one. > tcpreplay uses it's own in-tree version of libopts (and installs a > shared library for it, no less). I plan to submit this for FE, but I > think we need to sort out this libopts business first. Can you patch it to use 'autogen-devel' instead? FYI, libopts has been removed now. autogen is still broken in FC5 as far as I know due to some odd build failures... If anyone has any ideas: http://buildsys.fedoraproject.org/build-status/job.psp?uid=24510 kevin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
