Re: Fedora Extras Package Build Report 2006-12-24

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: "Discussion related to Fedora Extras" <fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Fedora Extras Package Build Report 2006-12-24
From: "Chitlesh GOORAH" <chitlesh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 24 Dec 2006 23:54:50 +0100
In-reply-to: <20061224224253.8C24315212E@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <20061224224253.8C24315212E@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: Discussion related to Fedora Extras <fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx>

On 12/24/06, buildsys@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx  wrote:

(!)  toped-0.8.2-2.fc7 : INVALID rebuild, not published!


I've fixed it :)


Chitlesh
--
http://clunixchit.blogspot.com

--
fedora-extras-list mailing list
fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list

References:
- Fedora Extras Package Build Report 2006-12-24
  - From: buildsys

Prev by Date: Re: Can someone school me on desktop file creation fixups?
Next by Date: Re: Can someone school me on desktop file creation fixups?
Previous by thread: Fedora Extras Package Build Report 2006-12-24
Next by thread: (1/2) Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras - 2006-12-24
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Fedora General Discussion] [Fedora Art] [Fedora Docs] [Fedora Package Review] [Fedora Desktop] [Big List of Linux Books] [Yosemite Backpacking] [KDE Users]

Powered by Linux