Re: bcfg2 license?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wednesday 20 December 2006 10:16, Hans de Goede wrote:

> What is wrong with this license?? There are a lot of other packages out
> there both in Core and Extras with licenses not on the mentioned list,
> once again the guidelines mention these 3 list as CLARIFICATION, not as
> a list of the only permitted ones, this is not a black and white
> situation. I challenge you to please tell me whats wrong with the
> crystal stacker license from a freedom POV. Fedora is all about Freedom,
> restriciting the software which can go on to only that with licenses on
> a few stupid lists restricts Freedom and thus is bad, <period> .
Lets run the licenses by the FSF and see what they say?  if they say its free 
software its ok  If they say its not then its not.


-- 
 ,-._|\    Dennis Gilmore, RHCE
/      \   Proud Australian
\_.--._/   | Aurora | Fedora |
      v    

-- 
fedora-extras-list mailing list
fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Backpacking]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux