Re: (1/2) Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras - 2006-12-11

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Rex Dieter wrote:
> Rex Dieter wrote:
> 
>> Rex Dieter wrote:
>>
>>> José Matos wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Monday 11 December 2006 9:53 pm, Tim Jackson wrote:
>>>>> Jose, do you want to go ahead and pick it up? If so, please do.
>>>>> Otherwise I guess one of the other maintainers (like me) with stuff
>>>>> depending on fltk had better do it...
>>>>   I see that Rex picked this package for EPEL. Rex, do you want also to
>>>>   own
>>>> this package for Fedora?
>>> I likely will (eventually), if no one else does, since OpenEXR needs it.
>> I guess that's gonna have to be sooner rather than later, since OpenEXR is
>> currently busted (and I can't fix koffice without it).
>>
>> OK, who was the bozo that yanked fltk from the repo without giving anyone
>> a chance to jump in and fix it first?  (:
> 
> I fixed it up, and queue'd a build. Any/all takers are welcome to
> co-maintain this.

Build failed, see
http://buildsys.fedoraproject.org/logs/fedora-development-extras/23586-fltk-1.1.7-6.fc7/
Looks like we're hitting some 64bit issues, issues which previous gcc
versions considered (permissive) warnings, now report errors.  Any input
would be appreciated.

-- Rex

-- 
fedora-extras-list mailing list
fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Backpacking]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux