On Mon, 11 Dec 2006 22:57:28 -0600, Rex Dieter wrote: > Rex Dieter wrote: > > > José Matos wrote: > > > >> On Monday 11 December 2006 9:53 pm, Tim Jackson wrote: > >>> Jose, do you want to go ahead and pick it up? If so, please do. > >>> Otherwise I guess one of the other maintainers (like me) with stuff > >>> depending on fltk had better do it... > >> > >> I see that Rex picked this package for EPEL. Rex, do you want also to > >> own > >> this package for Fedora? > > > > I likely will (eventually), if no one else does, since OpenEXR needs it. > > I guess that's gonna have to be sooner rather than later, since OpenEXR is > currently busted (and I can't fix koffice without it). > > OK, who was the bozo that yanked fltk from the repo without giving anyone a > chance to jump in and fix it first? (: Several months have been enough. Further, FE development is in bad shape currently anyway. So, it doesn't hurt to break a few more dependencies. Either fltk in CVS still rebuilds fine or does not. In case of the latter, it will need a maintainer rather sooner than later. -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
