On Sat, Dec 09, 2006 at 03:01:11PM -0500, Jesse Keating wrote:
> On Saturday 09 December 2006 14:53, Axel Thimm wrote:
> > But let's face reality: For example how many packages survived w/o a
> > rebuild from FC5 to FC6 in extras? 29! That's less that 0.5% of the
> > whole repo. And note that only packages with a disttag would had been
> > rebuilt anyway, so the whole point does not apply. E.g. any package
> > with %{?dist} in the release will have to be rebuilt at some time from
> > FC5->FC6 or FC6->FC7 anyhow.
>
> The reason the majority of the rebuilds happened was because of switching to a
> new build system, we wanted to make every package built with said new build
> system. This doesn't happen every release.
OK, let's assume this was only for this release cycle and look back at
all release cycles. Here are some numbers for i386 for FC1-FC6:
Extras:
Total number of packages: 16731
Total number of unique packages: 16526 (98.8%)
Core w/o updates:
Total number of packages: 10992
Total number of unique packages: 10908 (99.2%)
So the package rebuild is about 99%. Here are some more numbers on
packages that were not rebuild from release to release:
FC5->FC6: 29 extras, 0 core
FC4->FC5: 62 extras, 0 core
FC3->FC4: 17 extras, 39 core
FC2->FC3: --, 0 core
FC1->FC2: --, 3 core
--
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
Attachment:
pgpGAAkbTrVql.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
