Re: Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras development - 2006-12-06

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>>>>> "DG" == Devrim GUNDUZ <devrim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

DG> As I told today, something weird is going on here -- AFAICS there
DG> are no packages that provides libpq.so.5 in FC-6

If you haven't rebuilt your package for rawhide since FC6 branched,
your rawhide packages will still have the "fc6" dist tag.  Look
further down in the report to see which repository the package was
found in.

 - J<

-- 
fedora-extras-list mailing list
fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Backpacking]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux