Re: Adoption of alsa-tools

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Discussion related to Fedora Extras <fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Adoption of alsa-tools
From: Linus Walleij <triad@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2006 10:06:20 +0100 (CET)
In-reply-to: <4575D371.6030908@xxxxxxxxxx>
References: <Pine.GSO.4.60.0611222311270.13239@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <45702104.2080105@xxxxxxxxxx> <4575D371.6030908@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: Discussion related to Fedora Extras <fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx>

On Tue, 5 Dec 2006, Tim Jackson wrote:

does anyone object if I ExcludeArch ppc for now so that at least the userswith x86 can use this package? I will open a corresponding BZ.


It's OK.

Linus

--
fedora-extras-list mailing list
fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list

References:
- Adoption of alsa-tools
  - From: Linus Walleij
- Re: Adoption of alsa-tools
  - From: Tim Jackson
- Re: Adoption of alsa-tools
  - From: Tim Jackson

Prev by Date: Re: rpms/xl2tpd/devel xl2tpd.spec, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2
Next by Date: Re: rpms/xl2tpd/devel xl2tpd.spec, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2
Previous by thread: Re: Adoption of alsa-tools
Next by thread: hammer1 and hammer3 appear to be down
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Fedora General Discussion] [Fedora Art] [Fedora Docs] [Fedora Package Review] [Fedora Desktop] [Big List of Linux Books] [Yosemite Backpacking] [KDE Users]

Powered by Linux