On Mon, 2006-11-27 at 21:07 +0100, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: > > Thus Gérard is right, -devel subpackage is not needed. > > Why not call the main package -devel and forget the whole issue? In and of itself, it is *only* a development package, similar to the GNU toolchain (gcc/binutils/etc). Hence, (as I see it) there is no need for the -devel naming since it does not have a corresponding runtime-only component. -- Peter Gordon (codergeek42) GnuPG Public Key ID: 0xFFC19479 / Fingerprint: DD68 A414 56BD 6368 D957 9666 4268 CB7A FFC1 9479 My Blog: http://thecodergeek.com/blog/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
