On Sun, 26 Nov 2006 14:42:47 +0100, Till Maas wrote: > On Sunday 26 November 2006 01:08, Michael Schwendt wrote: > > > Everybody is free to write code that creates different reports and > > different statistics. > > Is there any documentation about this? Nothing beyond code in "fedora" cvs: http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/?root=fedora > Another improvement for the broken dependencies and any other reports is a > header with an URL to the wiki where the report is described, e.g. I do not > really know how to interpret the broken dependencies reports and how one can > fix this if ones packages show up there. If you query your binary rpm like rpm --query --requires --package foo-1.0-1.i386.rpm you get a list of what things your package depends on (library SONAMEs, other packages' names, interpreter programs, e.g.). If anything of that is not provided by any package in the repository, the report lists what is missing: blender-2.42a-5.fc7.i386 requires libgettextlib-0.15.so means "blender" is broken because no package provides the needed "libgettextlib-0.15.so". -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
