On Friday 24 November 2006 18:16, Steven Pritchard wrote: > On Fri, Nov 24, 2006 at 11:02:34PM +0100, Thomas M Steenholdt wrote: > > > So since we're already discussing this, what if all packages that put > > stuff in logrotate.d, do so from a sub-package... httpd-logrotate (or > > something)... The -logrotate sub packages should require logrotate and > > of-course the main package (httpd in this case). Users can remove > > logrotate and with it, all the -logrotate subpackages from cups, httpd > > and the rest, but the software will still install and run just fine. > > But what makes you think users will ask to install all that to begin > with? > > That's just begging for a million "/var filled up" bugzilla tickets. not that its a huge deal either way but if im using central log servers only then there will be nothing to rotate. however Disk is cheap and users who don't really know what they are doing will fill up /var with huge log files and users who should know better could slip up at some time. so we really expect and want log rotation for the most part. the only viable solution is to have those packages Requires: logrotate -- ,-._|\ Dennis Gilmore, RHCE / \ Proud Australian \_.--._/ | Aurora | Fedora | v -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
