Re: rpms/streamtuner/FC-6 streamtuner.spec,1.10,1.11

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thursday 23 November 2006 14:52, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Thu, 23 Nov 2006 08:18:40 -0500, Matthias Haase (endur) wrote:
> > Author: endur
> >
> > Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/streamtuner/FC-6
> >
> > Log Message:
> > bump up release once again proper formated
> >
> > -Release: 14%{?dist}.1
>
> That one was okay.  Most-significant portion left of %dist,
> least-significant portion to the very right.
>
> > +Release: 14.2%{?dist}
>
> 14.2 is "higher than" 14.fc and hence not a good idea when using %{?dist}

I am not sure to understand. The following guidelines:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/DistTag#head-5fff04551074fb311a96352be7e7cc3006c90f25
indicate to put the dist tag at the very end of the release tag.

If the previous release tag of streamtuner had been "14.1%{?dist}", would it 
have been correct? (sorry if I failed to conjugate that sequence correctly.)

-- 
fedora-extras-list mailing list
fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Backpacking]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux