On Wed, Oct 18, 2006 at 08:42:35AM -0500, Jima wrote: > On Wed, 18 Oct 2006, Gianluca Sforna wrote: > >For the latter, we could maintain a list (along the lines of the > >WishList page) where interested upstreams can add their project and > >look for a maintainer. > > +1, I agree with this approach. I strongly suspect Patrice was thinking > more of the latter and probably not at all about the former type (of which > there are clearly a few). Indeed, it is the kind of examples I had in mind. However I still think that anytime an upstream maintainer is also a fedora package maintainer, there is a risk that he forget the differences between both. It won't happen everytime, but we should be carefull. This danger certainly disappears for maintainers with deep involvment in extras. > This doesn't seem like a bad idea, but I'm not totally convinced that > upstream needs CVS access in all cases. That still requires them to not I agree. In my opinion what is interesting for upstream is to be in CC for the bugs (including submission), and later to communicate, but I don't think cvs access for them is needed. -- Pat -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
