Damien Durand (splinux) wrote: > +* Sun Oct 15 2006 Damien Durand <splinux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> - 2.2.2-4 > +- Add perl-XML-Parser in BR Shouldn't this be perl(XML::Parser), and not a hardcoded package name? The reason for this is that (as I understand it) the perl module functionality may be provided by another module or by Perl itself sometime in the future, and therefore RPM would find that it would satisfy the XML::Parser module need, and your spec file would thus need no changing. Is there a policy of sorts on this? Packaging/Perl on the wiki doesn't mention anything to this effect. Thanks. -- Peter Gordon (codergeek42) GnuPG Public Key ID: 0xFFC19479 / Fingerprint: DD68 A414 56BD 6368 D957 9666 4268 CB7A FFC1 9479 My Blog: http://thecodergeek.com/blog/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
