On Sat, 2006-10-14 at 13:32 -0700, Hans de Goede wrote:
> * Sat Oct 14 2006 Hans de Goede <j.w.r.degoede@xxxxxx> 5.1.1-1
> - New upstream release 5.1.1
> - Fix detection of readline during compile (iow add readline support back)
[...]
> --- lua.spec 28 Aug 2006 04:24:13 -0000 1.18
> +++ lua.spec 14 Oct 2006 20:32:35 -0000 1.19
> @@ -1,16 +1,14 @@
> Name: lua
> -Version: 5.1
> -Release: 7%{?dist}
> +Version: 5.1.1
> +Release: 1%{?dist}
> Summary: Powerful light-weight programming language
> -
> Group: Development/Languages
> License: MIT
[...]
> -BuildRequires: readline-devel, ncurses-devel
> +BuildRequires: readline-devel ncurses-devel
Doesn't linking lua with readline mean that the combined work now falls
under the GPL, not MIT? If so, I think it would be good to change the
License tag to reflect that. Or if possible, to split the parts that
have been linked with readline into a separate GPL licensed subpackage,
leaving everything else MIT.
Actually maybe even better, look into linking with libedit instead?
http://lua-users.org/lists/lua-l/2006-02/msg00472.html
--
fedora-extras-list mailing list
fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
