On Thu, 2006-10-12 at 23:52 +0200, Nicolas Mailhot wrote: > Le jeudi 12 octobre 2006 à 16:02 -0400, seth vidal a écrit : > > On Thu, 2006-10-12 at 21:57 +0200, Frank Büttner wrote: > > > Now we have the problem that 2 services use the same port. > > > To fix this and prevent other services to fall in this trap, we need to > > > build an list in FC Extra with port's all in use. > > > So here the first entry for the list: > > > All other maintainer shut add his services to this list. > > > ________________________________ > > > Port Protocol Service > > > 8000 TCP nas > > > > > > I'm pretty sure the IANA trumps us when it comes to port assignment. > > A lot of ports won't go through IANA, and we should document then in the > Fedora /etc/services, if only so : > 1. packages do no step on one another's port > 2. we can filter them in iptables by name > > Once upon a time Fedora tried to keep /etc/services small (which forced > everyone to use local incompatible assignments) but I think the new aim > is to actually document the ports a Fedora user may use (which certainly > includes ports used by FC or FE apps) OO OO - let's push for /etc/services.d/ :) -sv -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
