Daniel P. Berrange schrieb: > On Thu, Oct 12, 2006 at 01:00:44PM -0700, Garrick Staples wrote: >> On Thu, Oct 12, 2006 at 09:57:18PM +0200, Frank B?ttner alleged: >>> Now we have the problem that 2 services use the same port. >>> To fix this and prevent other services to fall in this trap, we need to >>> build an list in FC Extra with port's all in use. >>> So here the first entry for the list: >>> All other maintainer shut add his services to this list. >>> ________________________________ >>> Port Protocol Service >>> 8000 TCP nas >> Looks like 8000 is already taken by irdmi!! >> http://www.iana.org/assignments/port-numbers > > Its also taken by Xen for its Dom0 management daemon. Any list of apps wanting > port 8000 is going to be many pages long... > > Regards, > Dan. I think there will be much more services on this port. The idea at this time is first to collect all conflict packages and then try to assign new port to all conflict packages.
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
-- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
