On Thu, 12 Oct 2006 14:46:05 -0500 (CDT), Jima wrote: > On Thu, 12 Oct 2006, Frank Büttner wrote: > > For the other Bugs I get mails. But that is not the topic. > > The topic is that every body modify packages of other. And that is an > > very big problem. When that goes forward then it will impossible for > > maintainers to maintain it packages, because the packages will be every > > time out of sync:( > > If you don't want people touching your packages, then you need to see and > respond to bugs filed against them. (Yes, I periodically check Bugzilla > for bugs filed against me, regardless of the fact that email notification > should bring them to my attention.) If there hadn't been a bug filed > already, then I might be prone to agree with you. Alas, there was, and > most people I've heard from agreed with Rex's actions. If you don't care > for the cooperative nature of open source software, then I'm not sure what > to tell you -- most of us are willing to play well with others. However, reformatting of spec files and regrouping BRs is not nice: https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-extras-commits/2006-October/msg01273.html This has happened here and maybe has given a false impression, since this can result in more CVS conflicts than necessary. If there's something easy to fix and the packager seems unavailable (after several contact attempts), it is a demonstration of sense of responsibility if a fellow project member applies the fix. Still, that's no excuse for modifying more details than necessary. -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list