Re: Soon to be marked dead packages

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, 2006-10-08 at 21:48 +0100, Paul wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> > > > gdeskcal
> > > 
> > > Dunno how that slipped through the net, but it's now been rebuilt.
> > 
> > It was still listed as orphaned in Extras/OrphanedPackages in the Wiki
> > and owners.list in CVS - I've fixed them.
> 
> Um, it was fixed in the owners.list this morning.

Nope, I fixed it about an hour ago, it had been assigned to the orphan
owner since Sep 20 before that:
http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/owners/owners.list?root=extras&r1=1.1798&r2=1.1799

> > Everyone, if you claim something from the orphaned list, don't just push
> > rebuilds.  Make sure you've updated Extras/OrphanedPackages in Wiki
> > *and* owners.list in CVS.
> 
> Do I need to claim a package already mine? Fair enough...

If it's listed having the extras-orphan owner in owners.list and
included in the orphans page, it's orphaned, not yours...

-- 
fedora-extras-list mailing list
fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Backpacking]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux