Michael Schwendt schrieb: > On Sun, 08 Oct 2006 16:14:32 +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: >> Michael Schwendt schrieb: >>> On Sun, 08 Oct 2006 13:48:03 +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: >>> Now there is one big misplaced section "For Developers" again in which you >>> can get lost easily. >> Well, before I got over it and moved things back and forth I found some >> thing in sections where I wouldn't have found them myself. So it was >> intuitive either afaics. > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras?action=recall&rev=113 > What did you dislike? - [TOC] IMHO takes to much space in the most important area for a small gain - "Contributing to Fedora Extras" should be more on top -- those that are contributors already will be able to find their stuff even if it's not that well placed; - "Extras for x86_64 status and FAQ", obsolete, old, unamitained -> removed; dito "Extras Ideas Sandbox" - "CVS Admin requests" should be in the same area as "Repository status pages for requesting manual copies and removals of packages" - "How to sponsor a new contributor?" directly behind "How to get sponsored?" is IMHO confusing because one that interested in the later will never be intereted in the first - "Reporting Issues" -> was not sure about this one myself, but maybe is more a users task? - "Contributing to Fedora Extras" and "Adding packages to Fedora Extras" -> Contributing to Fedora Extras means in 99% of the cases to add packages to Fedora Extras. So where is the difference? - Stuff that Packaging/ IMHO should have s separate section Those are some reasons behind by re-organization. CU thl -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
