On Tue, 26 Sep 2006 21:22:30 +0530, Rahul wrote: > Toshio Kuratomi wrote: > > Hey guys, > > > > I'm working on a script to parse owners.list and import it into the new > > PackageDB. So far, the biggest hurdle has been that some email > > addresses in owners.list do not match with the email addresses in the > > accounts system. I've tracked most of these down with a few exceptions > > and caveats. > > > > extras-qa [] fedoraproject.org: This is the initial qa contact that is > > entered into bugzilla for bugs on a package. I'd like to discard this > > information and start fresh in the new packageDB. If a qa-contact > > should be applied to the package then it should be entered for each > > package, otherwise there will be no qa-contact. If we are currently > > using extras-qa to do something useful please let me know so we can work > > out what's sane to do here. > > > > extras-orphan [] fedoraproject.org: For orphaned packages. I think > > we're going to create an orphan account to fill this. > > > > Is there any particular reason this should be changed from nobody [] > fedoraproject.org? <?> The bugzilla account e-mail address for orphaned packages has always been extras-orphan [] fedoraproject.org -- this is useful, because the address can be monitored and use in custom queries. Eliminating it would not be good. -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
