Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
28 Packages not present in the development repo -> most of them probably should be marked as dead.package in cvs. If they get re-submitted later they should go though a full review again.
Be careful with this. Some of these packages were recently built, but didn't make it to the repo in time for the report (wfut, for example)
3 packages which have not yet been FE-APPROVED -> heck, why?
#189375 (Maelstrom) moved from Core to Extras quite a while ago, and per the owner's request is now undergoing a formal review. There's a minor licensing question that has been pushed upstream and we're waiting for a response.
--Mike -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
