Hi! Thorsten Leemhuis schrieb: [...] > As FC6 is approaching and Ignacio seems to be AWOL for a long time now > we'll speed up the AWOL process. In other words: All of Ignacio's > packages are hereby considered orphaned. It's sad to lose such a major > contributor, but we can't avoid it any longer. A lot of Ignacio's packages found a new owner in the past week and most of the new maintainers are listed in owners.list already. I just updated the list in the wiki slightly and removed the packages where the new maintainer forgot to update it after updateing owners.list (*1). Here are those listed that are still in the wiki: MikeKnox: > ||deskbar-applet||2006-08-29, MikeKnox would like to take this|| > ||fltk||2006-08-29, MikeKnox would like to take this|| > ||fyre||2006-08-29, MikeKnox would like to take this|| > ||leafpad||2006-08-29, MikeKnox would like to take this|| > ||pam_mysql||2006-08-29, MikeKnox would like to take this|| LukeMacken: > ||python-formencode||2006-08-29, LukeMacken would like to take this. || > ||python-json||2006-08-29, LukeMacken would like to take this. || > ||python-sqlobject||2006-08-29, LukeMacken would like to take this. || > ||python-TestGears||2006-08-29, LukeMacken would like to take this. || > ||python-nose|| LukeMacken is willing to take this. || > ||TurboGears||2006-08-29, LukeMacken would like to take this. || Some others: > ||hamlib|| 2006-08-29 BobJensen DennisGilmore would like to co-maintain|| > ||MochiKit||2006-08-28, KonstantinRyabitsev claims ownership|| > ||mod_auth_pam||2006-08-28, BrandonHolbrook would like to take this|| > ||numpy||2006-08-28, JarodWilson would like to take over this package|| > ||OpenEXR||2006-08-28, RexDieter|| > ||php-json||2006-08-28, KonstantinRyabitsev claims ownership, also BrandonHolbrook via [http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/198564] || Guys, please start the takeover process soon! tia! PeterGordon added this: > ||gnome-applet-rhythmbox||2006-08-28, This package should me marked dead (renamed to gnome-applet-music by upstream since it supports more than just Rhythmbox). --PeterGordon|| > ||gnome-theme-clearlooks||This should probably be marked dead too, as it was only for FC-3 and is now integrated with the gtk2-engines package. --PeterGordon|| Peter (or someone else interested), could you mark them as dead in cvs but nevertheless take over in owners.list in case bugs get filed against this old crud? No new maintainers in sight for these yet: > ||ecore|||| > ||edb|||| > ||edje|||| > ||eet|||| > ||embryo|||| > ||evas|||| > ||f2py|||| > ||gnet2|||| > ||libifp|||| > ||lock-keys-applet|||| > ||mimetex|||| > ||pyparsing|||| > ||python-amara|||| > ||python-cpio|||| > ||python-HTMLgen|||| > ||repoml|||| According to command (*2) $ for i in ecore edb edje eet embryo evas f2py gnet2 libifp lock-keys-applet mimetex pyparsing python-amara python-cpio python-HTMLgen repoml; do echo ${i}; repoquery -q --whatrequires $(repoquery -q --provides ${i}) | sort | uniq ; echo; done some of them are required by other pacakges: ecore ecore-0:0.9.9.026-1.fc5.x86_64 ecore-0:0.9.9.026-2.fc5.x86_64 ecore-devel-0:0.9.9.026-1.fc5.x86_64 ecore-devel-0:0.9.9.026-2.fc5.x86_64 ecore-directfb-0:0.9.9.026-2.fc5.x86_64 edje-0:0.5.0.026-1.fc5.x86_64 edb edb-0:1.0.5.005-1.fc5.x86_64 edb-0:1.0.5.007-1.fc5.x86_64 edb-devel-0:1.0.5.005-1.fc5.x86_64 edb-devel-0:1.0.5.007-1.fc5.x86_64 edb-gtk-0:1.0.5.005-1.fc5.x86_64 edb-gtk-0:1.0.5.007-1.fc5.x86_64 edb-ncurses-0:1.0.5.005-1.fc5.x86_64 edb-ncurses-0:1.0.5.007-1.fc5.x86_64 evas-0:0.9.9.026-1.fc5.x86_64 evas-edb-0:0.9.9.026-2.fc5.x86_64 edje edje-0:0.5.0.026-1.fc5.x86_64 edje-devel-0:0.5.0.026-1.fc5.x86_64 eet ecore-0:0.9.9.026-1.fc5.x86_64 ecore-0:0.9.9.026-2.fc5.x86_64 ecore-devel-0:0.9.9.026-1.fc5.x86_64 ecore-devel-0:0.9.9.026-2.fc5.x86_64 edje-0:0.5.0.026-1.fc5.x86_64 eet-0:0.9.10.023-2.fc5.x86_64 eet-0:0.9.10.026-1.fc5.x86_64 eet-devel-0:0.9.10.023-2.fc5.x86_64 eet-devel-0:0.9.10.026-1.fc5.x86_64 evas-0:0.9.9.026-1.fc5.x86_64 evas-0:0.9.9.026-2.fc5.x86_64 embryo edje-0:0.5.0.026-1.fc5.x86_64 embryo-0:0.9.1.023-1.fc5.x86_64 embryo-0:0.9.1.026-1.fc5.x86_64 embryo-devel-0:0.9.1.023-1.fc5.x86_64 embryo-devel-0:0.9.1.026-1.fc5.x86_64 evas ecore-0:0.9.9.026-1.fc5.x86_64 ecore-0:0.9.9.026-2.fc5.x86_64 edje-0:0.5.0.026-1.fc5.x86_64 evas-0:0.9.9.026-1.fc5.x86_64 evas-0:0.9.9.026-2.fc5.x86_64 evas-devel-0:0.9.9.026-1.fc5.x86_64 evas-devel-0:0.9.9.026-2.fc5.x86_64 evas-directfb-0:0.9.9.026-2.fc5.x86_64 evas-edb-0:0.9.9.026-2.fc5.x86_64 f2py gnet2 fyre-0:1.0.0-13.fc5.x86_64 gnet2-devel-0:2.0.7-6.fc5.x86_64 gurlchecker-0:0.10.0-1.fc5.x86_64 gurlchecker-0:0.10.0-2.fc5.x86_64 pan-1:0.14.2.91-4.fc5.x86_64 workrave-0:1.8.2-2.fc5.x86_64 workrave-0:1.8.3-1.fc5.x86_64 libifp amarok-0:1.4.1-2.fc5.x86_64 amarok-0:1.4.1-3.fc5.x86_64 libifp-0:1.0.0.2-2.fc5.x86_64 libifp-devel-0:1.0.0.2-2.fc5.x86_64 lock-keys-applet mimetex moodle-0:1.5.3-2.fc5.noarch moodle-0:1.5.4-1.fc5.noarch pyparsing pydot-0:0.9.10-3.fc5.noarch tinyerp-server-0:3.3.0-1.fc5.noarch tinyerp-server-0:3.3.0-2.fc5.noarch python-amara python-cpio python-HTMLgen repoml I suggest we remove them from the repo (after an additional warning later this week) shortly after Sunday, September 10, 23:59 UTC -- that leaves round about a month before FC6 for the maintainers of the other packages to fix up the dependency chain. CU thl (*1) Site note: guys, next time when you update owners.list to take over a orphaned package *please* remove it also from the wiki page! tia! I had to do some manual and annoying cleanup there before I could start working on this mail. See http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/OrphanedPackages?action=diff&rev2=348&rev1=347 (*2) Is there a better/easier way to do that? Is this way actually correct? -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
