On Wed, 30 Aug 2006, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
DL> That's true, but if we automated a coverity run on every FE DL>
package and published the results on the web, we might have DL> upstream
projects wondering "Why is my project not included in DL> Fedora Extras
?"...
Which would certainly be a plus.
Please don't get the impression that I'm against this; I just think
everyone needs to be clear on what the expectations are, and how this
interacts with the other maintainer responsibilities (which, indeed,
have yet to be fully defined).
The expectation, in my opinion is, that we'll get a bunch of feedback and
do with it what we can.
--
Max Spevack
+ http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/MaxSpevack
+ gpg key -- http://spevack.org/max.asc
+ fingerprint -- CD52 5E72 369B B00D 9E9A 773E 2FDB CB46 5A17 CF21
--
fedora-extras-list mailing list
fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
