On 8/31/06, Warren Togami <wtogami@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Same thing in principle. Why does Coverity need to be in our build system? It could very well work asynchronously outside of Fedora from our SRPMS.
I would really prefer this sort of outside the fenceline cooperation. I don't have any problem with Coverity hosting a service that chews on our publicly accessible data like the srpms and then spits back reports to us (in an open file format of course :->). Is it even worthwhile to think about anything other than asynchronous scans? Wouldn't this slow down build process significantly if these scans were tied into the building of every package? -jef -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list