On Wed, 2006-08-30 at 22:42 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote: > On Wed, 2006-08-30 at 18:10 -0400, Warren Togami wrote: > > My Proposal > > ========== > > A good compromise would be for Coverity to be run outside of the scope > > of the Fedora Project as just a Red Hat thing. It would run > > asynchronously on the binary RPMS in pushed repositories. If Fedora > > contributors are interested in helping to better automate this they are > > free to do so. > > > > This way Fedora and upstream benefits from Coverity analysis, and Fedora > > remains ideologically pure. > > > > Thoughts? > > Warren, its a _source_ analysis tool. Running it on binary packages > won't do much good... > It could be taught how to run on source rpms, though. So Warren's point about tying directly into the buildsys not being necessary is still valid. -Toshio
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
