Re: Any users of atomic_ops?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 2006-08-29 at 21:06 +0200, Pierre Ossman wrote:
> Hi there,
> 
> PulseAudio recently added a dependency to the atomic_ops package. As I
> can't find this package in Fedora, I'm in a bit of a pickle. I suppose I
> could put up a review request with an rpm for it, but the package is a
> bit odd so I'm considering another approach.
> 
> atomic_ops seems to be only intended for static link use, as it doesn't
> build any .so files. An idea I had was to just include this tarball in
> the PulseAudio package and get a bit creative with the build process.
> The metacity package used this approach for libcm, so it's not unheard of...
> 
> Comments? Flames? Public flogging?
> 

I don't know what atomic ops PulseAudio uses, but glib implements a
number of atomic operations since at least 2.8, so one option would be
to convince upstream to switch to these, if they suit the needs.

-- 
fedora-extras-list mailing list
fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Backpacking]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux