>>>>> "MS" == Michael Schwendt <bugs.michael@xxxxxxx> writes: MS> Feasible, but half-hearted unless there is some strict policy on MS> who may touch such "unmaintained" packages. We have no such strict policy on who may touch even maintained packages now. The intention is to indicate when a package release is unmaintained. Nothing more. Lack of this indication has caused problems in the past and will continue to do so. I am not proposing any change in policy with respect to unmaintained release branches, since there is none. They already exist, but nobody has any clue as to which branches are maintained and which are not. - J< -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
