On Thu, 2006-08-24 at 09:06 +0200, Denis Leroy wrote: > Michael J. Knox wrote: > > Ignacio has been missing for sometime. The AWOL guide lines is a good > > place to start. I think some people have picked up on some of his packages > > already, but the AWOL process should be used here. > I would appreciate if an executive decision was made in this case, and a > simplified or expedite process started. I went through the AWOL > guidelines for wp_tray, and it was NAKed. Do you have a link for this? A quick bugzilla search didn't turn it up. If the process has already been gone through, it should be pretty simple to go to the last step. If it stalled somewhere along the way we should figure out where we need to pick up from. > I'm not going through it > again. Could we have temporary maintenance or co-maintenance assigned > for his packages, so at least the urgent fixes and rebuilds can be dealt > with ? This might be possible. I'd like to know we are abiding by at least the spirit of the AWOL policy, though, so records of when Ignacio was contacted would be helpful. -Toshio
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
