Re: FC-4 branch request

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Saturday, 19 August 2006 at 01:48, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> >>>>> "DM" == Dominik Mierzejewski <Dominik> writes:
> 
> DM> I'd like to request FC-4 branch for crm114.
> 
> Could you give a reason why this needs to be branched for FC4?

Well, the whole point of getting tre into FE was to get crm114 in, too.
Granted, tre (and agrep) are useful on their own, but without crm114
it feels like stopping half-way and leaving unfinished work to me.

As I said, I managed to slip tre in around the time it became Legacy,
but crm114 couldn't make it in time.

I'm sure Jima would concur, as he was interested in both of these, too.

Regards,
R.

-- 
Fedora Extras contributor http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/DominikMierzejewski
MPlayer developer         http://rpm.greysector.net/mplayer/
"Faith manages."
        -- Delenn to Lennier in Babylon 5:"Confessions and Lamentations"

-- 
fedora-extras-list mailing list
fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Backpacking]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux