On Fri, 2006-08-11 at 05:33 +0530, Rahul wrote: > Toshio Kuratomi wrote: > > > > > P.S. The packaging committee usually asks for comments from FESCo and > > Core and then the policy goes into effect the following week if there > > were no objections. > > Which people from Core? Is it the release engineering team? > Can you document your working methodology somewhere? In the past it was up to Jesse Keating to make sure that the relevant people in Core were given the information and take the objections back to the Packaging Committee. For this week (and presumably if it works well, for the future) Jesse asked that the changes be emailed to the fedora-maintainers mailing list as a heads-up and in case anyone found the change objectionable. http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Committee Says that the current methodology is for representatives from Core and Extras (currently Jesse for Core and Packaging Committee Members that are also on FESCo for Extras) will present the information. Several weeks ago the Packaging Committee and FESCo agreed that this process would also handle objections to the policies. For FESCo, the Packaging Committee has been presenting its meeting summary at the FESCo meeting which occurs directly after. Today's FESCo discussed the possibility of doing some of this via email which would require the Packaging Committee or FESCo to change the weekday they meet so there's time for a summary to be emailed and viewed by the members. The email to maintainers-list also is happening for the first time today. If it continues to be the norm we'll document it on the Packaging/Committee page. -Toshio
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
