On Wed, 2006-08-09 at 11:16 -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: > On Wed, 2006-08-09 at 13:03 -0400, Jeremy Katz wrote: > > On Wed, 2006-08-09 at 18:46 +0200, Michał Bentkowski wrote: > > > 2006/8/9, Laurent Rineau <laurent.rineau__fedora_extras@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > > > > Actually, those guidelines are quite ambiguous: can a package ship .pyo files > > > > or not? > > > It is really ambigous... IMHO .pyo shouldn't be added to package and > > > this is done by doing %ghost macro. > > > > They need to be present so that things can end up with the correct > > SELinux context -- otherwise, if you run a python app with -O2 as a > > user, you end up getting various avc denials > > Unless I'm misremembering the issue, you get AVC denials in the logs due > to python's just-in-time byte compilation trying to write out the .pyo > file. The program should still run fine. Sure, but denials (even when things end up working properly) still lead people to believe that there's a problem. Jeremy -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
