Re: Update of the fish package

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Thank you for sponsoring me. I am testing the fedora development tools
and reading the development wiki, and hope to upload a new package in
a day or two. There seems to be a lot to learn.

On 8/1/06, Michael Schwendt <bugs.michael@xxxxxxx> wrote:
On Tue, 1 Aug 2006 01:59:04 +0200, Axel Liljencrantz wrote:

> Thank you. So the following
>
> %{!?fedora: %define fedora 6}
> %if "%fedora" >= "5"
> BuildRequires: xorg-x11-proto-devel libX11-devel libXt-devel
> %else
> BuildRequires: xorg-x11-devel
> %endif
>
> would be considered nicer than the original spec? I guess I'd agree.
> The main downside is that it will not work on non-fedora systems which
> do not use the same package names as fedora 5, which should be all pre
> X.org-7.0 systems.

Well, you could craft proper if-conditions for all supported releases of
%fedora and cover old systems via %else.

Alternatively, you can leave %fedora undefined whenever it is and
in that case check whether it's undefined:

%if 0%{?fedora}
# a non-Fedora system
%endif

Here, %{?fedora} only expands to something if defined, and because of the
prefix 0 the value becomes 0 (=false) if %fedora is undefined.

Thanks for the tip, that makes a lot of sense. I provide you with a
revised, unified monster. It is hardcoded to handle all known fedora
versions correctly, and in case of a non-fedora system, it falls back
to checking the layout of the filesystem and performing an educated
guess as to the correct dependencies.

I indented it using a single tab per block level, since it was
unreadable without indentation and the packaging guidelines do not
mention any indentation style recomendation. If there is an informal
common indentation style, please let me know.

# Locate correct build-dependencies for providing X headers
%if "%fedora" >= "5"
   #Modern Fedora version, has modular X.org
   BuildRequires: xorg-x11-proto-devel libX11-devel libXt-devel
%else
   %if "%fedora" >= "3"
       #Semi-old Fedora version, has non-modular X.org
       BuildRequires: xorg-x11-devel
   %else
       %if 0%{?fedora}
           #This is not a Fedora system, try guessing BuildRequires
by looking at the directory structure
           %define xinclude %( if test -d /usr/X11R6/include; then
echo /usr/X11R6/include; else echo /usr/include; fi )
           BuildRequires:          %{xinclude}/X11/StringDefs.h,
%{xinclude}/X11/Xlib.h
           BuildRequires:          %{xinclude}/X11/Intrinsic.h,
%{xinclude}/X11/Xatom.h
       %else
           #Ancient Fedora version, has XFree86
           BuildRequires: XFree86-devel
       %endif
   %endif
%endif

Does this look ok?


--
Axel

--
fedora-extras-list mailing list
fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Backpacking]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux