buildsys@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
perl-String-CRC32: paul AT city-fan.org 4: 0:1.4-1.fc4 (FE4) 5: 0:1.4-1.FC5 (FC5-updates) 6: 0:1.4-1.FC6.1 (FC6)
Shouldn't the email address attached to the report be the one for the person that needs to do something to fix this (in this case, the maintainer of the package for FC5-updates and FC6) rather than the person that caused the breakage (i.e. me, maintainer for FE4 :-( )?
Paul. -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list