On Sat, Jul 29, 2006 at 11:58:34AM +0100, Jose' Matos wrote: > > For what it's worth, locally I change that group to "Engineering, Math, and > > Science". > The question is really this, the relation between comps files and Groups. > Groups seems to be obsolete and never had (AFAIK) very clear rules. I mean I change that component; I leave the groups alone. > We ship several libraries that have other dependencies, and are interesting > in themselves, why should not them be referred in comps? Yes, this is kind of messy in the area of scientific computation. Also, development libraries. -- Matthew Miller mattdm@xxxxxxxxxx <http://mattdm.org/> Boston University Linux ------> <http://linux.bu.edu/> -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
