Patrice Dumas wrote: > On Wed, Jul 26, 2006 at 06:37:32PM +0200, Christian.Iseli@xxxxxxxx wrote: >> Hi folks, >> >> I checked the .xml.in files... The .xml seem a bit out of sync. >> I'm happy to sync them, but I'd like a go ahead first... >> >> The comps.xml seems in pretty poor shape ATM... Also, some things are not >> completely clear to me: > > I searched in the wiki, but I didn't found anything relevant, however > I remember that once a message was sent to a list explaining what should > go in comps. Maybe this should be added to the wiki. > > What I remember is that package and subpackages goes into comps, not > SRPM names. In comps there should only appear packages that are directly > usefull, so no library, no perl or python module (except when they > are associated with a usefull script). > > There seems to be exceptions to these exceptions since devel packages > appears in Development groups, and there are libs in > 'Engineering and Scientific'. > Yes, I thought the rule was only packages directly usefull to end users should go in. Can we have some guidelines on this? (Maybe a point for todays FESco meeting?) Regards, Hans -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
