Rahul schrieb: > Michael Thomas wrote: >> Denis Leroy wrote: >>> Michael J. Knox wrote: >>>> Which is what I figured.. fair game for unclaimed submissions. >>>> However, I would still prefer to see some indication if they are >>>> reviewing or not. >>> How do you know if a submission is unclaimed ? It looks like all new >>> submissions are assigned to Thorsten by default... >> The user 'bugzilla-sing@xxxxxxxxxxxxx' >> is the default 'unclaimed' user. "sink" actually -- that mailbox also has the comment "ignored mailbox" to indicate that it ignored ;-) >> Anything assigned to that name is fair game. Maybe we should set up >> something more obvious, such as 'unassigned@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx'? > Copying to DKL to make this happen. Well, yes, that might be better. But we first should make sure that such an email address at least exists. So I assume the infrastructure group or skvidal are those that have to do the first step. Does anyone want to poke them? BTW and just FYI: bugzilla-sink@xxxxxxxxxxxxx seems to be an interesting user -- he does not exist, but he did 13 reviews already according to http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/PackageStatus and https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/buglist.cgi?bug_id=179904,180068,181013,183097,183694,185407,186327,190949,191208,195692,196635,197753,197796 ;-) CU thl -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
