Michael J. Knox wrote: > Michael Thomas wrote: > >> Michael J. Knox wrote: >> >>> top posting, sorry.. >>> >>> What I find hard about reviewing is figuring out if a package is >>> actually under review or not. I see a metric shit load of comments, >>> suggestions and discussions on some FE-NEW submissions, but they remain >>> unassigned amd in FE-NEW. >> >> >> >>> Sometimes I will skip over a package simply becuase I don't know whats >>> going on. Some folks do the right thing and clearly state they are not >>> reviewing the package, which is great. >> >> >> >> If the bug has not been assigned to a real person, then it's up for >> grabs. It's not uncommon for people to jump into a review just to offer >> criticism/advice/feedback without wanting to commit to a full review. > > > Which is what I figured.. fair game for unclaimed submissions. However, > I would still prefer to see some indication if they are reviewing or not. This indication should come in the form of setting the 'Assigned To' field. If someone is reviewing a package, or planning on doing a full review, then this field should be set accordingly. Note that you have to look at 'Assigned To', not for 'Status: ASSIGNED' to see if the review is really assigned. If someone decides to unassign themselves, they can set the 'Assigned To' field back to the bugzilla-sink owner, but it's not possible to reset the 'Status' field back to 'NEW'. --Mike
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
-- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
