On Sun, 23 Jul 2006 20:51:36 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote: > Hi, > > As some of you may have noticed from my CVS commits, I'm taking over a > bunch of packages from Anvil, because Anvil has other priorities then FE > ATM. > > One of these packages is libtar. Before taking over I've done a quick QA > check of all the packages which involved amongst other stuff running > rpmlint. rpmlint on libtar gave some spurious messages because libtar > normally only build a static (.a) lib. > > The buildsys has just completed building a new libtar for devel which > contains a proper .so file, with soname, 100% PIC etc. So I would like > to ask all maintainers who maintain a package which uses libtar to build > and then test it against the new libtar in devel. There are zero packages in FE which BR libtar or libtar-devel -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
