Re: up-imapproxy (Re: Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras 5 - 2006-04-20)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Michael Schwendt wrote:
This is in bugzilla as

  https://bugzilla.redhat.com/185729  (and in the tracker bugs, too)

but the package maintainer has not responded in over a month. The mails
sent privately have not bounced. As soon as the buildsys server is reachable
again, the packages will be removed from the repository, since they are broken
anyway. Does it make sense to keep the fc4 packages? (I don't think so)

There is a maintainer (David Rees) willing to take over this package, who wanted to orphan it some time ago but was persuaded to hang on a little while. I think it's time for the takeover now.

http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-extras-list/2006-March/msg02001.html
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187186

Paul.


--
fedora-extras-list mailing list
fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Backpacking]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux