Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Python egg spec template https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189342 ville.skytta@xxxxxx changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO CC| |fedora-extras- | |list@xxxxxxxxxx ------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta@xxxxxx 2006-04-19 12:46 EST ------- I have no experience with python eggs, so Cc'ing the FE list for comments about the specfile contents and whether a separate template for them is actually needed. Some questions/notes though, assuming this will be added: fedora-newrpmspec should still continue to use the generic python template, no? Using %{name} and %{name}-%{version} in %files sounds a bit optimistic for my taste, it's not uncommon to slightly deviate from upstream naming in python package names, and I don't see %{name} or %{version} being passed to any build or install commands. --> there's a disconnect Also, the example %files entries use %{python_sitelib}, are the files always installed there, or sometimes to %{python_sitearch}? Due to the two potential issues above, I'd be inclined to just drop the example %files entries. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
