On Tue, 18 Apr 2006 11:08:53 +0200, Chitlesh GOORAH wrote:
> > For Fedora Core Development (aka Rawhide) there is a separate report.
> > Broken dependencies, which don't affect Fedora Extras _directly_,
> > are filtered out in my report.
>
> I have only core,extras and updates repos enabled.
Well, evolution and libpisock (pilot-link) are Core packages, not Extras,
so this is still the wrong mailing-list.
For Fedora Core 5, this would be found (and interestingly, in FC5 is
libpisock.so.9):
source rpm: evolution-2.6.1-1.fc5.2.src.rpm
package: evolution - 2.6.1-1.fc5.2.i386 from fedora-core-updates-5-i386
unresolved deps:
libpisock.so.8
source rpm: evolution-2.6.1-1.fc5.2.src.rpm
package: evolution - 2.6.1-1.fc5.2.x86_64 from fedora-core-updates-5-x86_64
unresolved deps:
libpisock.so.8()(64bit)
source rpm: evolution-2.6.1-1.fc5.2.src.rpm
package: evolution - 2.6.1-1.fc5.2.ppc from fedora-core-updates-5-ppc
unresolved deps:
libpisock.so.8
--
fedora-extras-list mailing list
fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
