Re: Where to report bugs for repoview?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1



seth vidal wrote:
> On Sat, 2006-04-15 at 11:43 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> If you point your browser at:
>> http://fedoraproject.org/extras/5/i386/repodata/repoview/games.group.html
>>
>> Then you see that many packages are listed twice (previous and current
>> release) I concider this a bug, where should I report this?
> 
> Why do you consider it a bug that it lists EVERY package in the
> repository?
> 

Because that is not what I want the end user to see when he clicks on
the view packages in extras links, wasn't the entire idea behind comps
file to only show the user packages which he is interested in and leave
out packages which exist for a good reason but are probably of little
interest (on their own) to the end user?

Also this is not consistent with how yum groupinfo or pirut handle this,
they only show the latest version, which is what one would expect.

Regards,

Hans
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFEQOA/47KA3t5s3+8RAkf/AKClCbNeEtexd3q5yvQFHwCXRtfE+ACgzm9l
+ZldJlvp5LA3eQhTdVvDINk=
=inRy
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

-- 
fedora-extras-list mailing list
fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Backpacking]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux