On Tue, 2006-04-11 at 21:50 +0200, Christoph Wickert wrote: > 2. Is it possible to see easytag unstable (1.99.12 ATM) in extras? I'm > using this package a lot so I rolled my own rpm and it's pretty stable > (IMO at least as stable as the 1.1 release). With yesterdays update the > annoying cddb bug is fixed, so I don't see no blocker there. Easytag 1.1 > depends on gtk+. C'mon - let's get rid of this old crap ASAP, at least > in development! Easytag kicks ass. It sure would be nice to have a GTK2 version. Looks like its maintained by Matthias, and 1.99.12 is already available in freshrpms. You could probably poke him to see about moving to 1.99.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
