On Tue, 11 Apr 2006 21:28:06 +0300, Ville Skyttä wrote: > On Mon, 2006-04-10 at 15:20 +0100, Paul Howarth wrote: > > > Whilst you're here, have you any view on the subject of allowing > > buildreqs listed in the "Exceptions" section of the packaging guidelines > > being "optional" rather than "must not"? > > Added to FESCO schedule [1], will be discussed in this week's meeting > unless it's resolved before it. > > [1] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/Schedule As long as we avoid BR rpm rpm-build gcc glibc-devel gcc-c++ libstdc++-devel fedora-release like the plague, I don't care about redundant BR. -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
