Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: paraview - Parallel visualization application https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187932 ------- Additional Comments From orion@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 2006-04-06 22:04 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > I think that VTK should be packaged separately, and then paraview should use the > installed VTK. Except if the embedded VTK is based on the cvs (which seems so) > and paraview needs that version, in that case, this could be done later. I principle, I agree and have done similar with other packages. However, this one is quite complex VTK is configured specifically for use with ParaView. The Kitware developers don't recommend it (though they don't support using the system Tcl/Tk which I have done). So, I'm planning on leaving it the way it is for now. In the meantime, I've got a new version that creates an MPI version as well (just need the new spec): http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/paraview.spec http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/paraview-2.4.3-2.src.rpm This is a beast to compile. Takes about 2 hours on a fast Athlon 64 system. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
