Re: gsview's AFPL licensing

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> > I also don't see why GSView is needed in Extras at all, given that:  
> > * there are alternatives (with less restrictive licensing)... 
> > * it uses the obsolete GTK+ 1.2,  
> > * repoquery --whatrequires gsview returns nothing.... 
>  
> This bit is irrelavent.  These additional criteria are not required for  
> including something in Extras. 
 
True, Extras does not have a policy against unneeded obsolete software. ;-) It 
does have a policy against non-Free software though. 
 
        Kevin Kofler 

-- 
fedora-extras-list mailing list
fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Backpacking]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux